<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contentious words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rerisk.net/2006/04/13/contentious-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rerisk.net/2006/04/13/contentious-words/</link>
	<description>Risk, Re-/Insurance and Future Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jolyonpatten</title>
		<link>http://www.rerisk.net/2006/04/13/contentious-words/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyonpatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerisk.net/?p=50#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Rupert - &quot;Ha!&quot; [no words, no charge]

David - I entirely agree, and your point is neatly made by the extraordinary and ridiculous lengths that we went to to try and sort out the correct usage of the word.  Even worse, I see now, looking back over the letter, I used the word twice.  I&#039;ll look for another construction in future, though sometimes it is just right - and fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert &#8211; &#8220;Ha!&#8221; [no words, no charge]</p>
<p>David &#8211; I entirely agree, and your point is neatly made by the extraordinary and ridiculous lengths that we went to to try and sort out the correct usage of the word.  Even worse, I see now, looking back over the letter, I used the word twice.  I&#8217;ll look for another construction in future, though sometimes it is just right &#8211; and fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rossmiller</title>
		<link>http://www.rerisk.net/2006/04/13/contentious-words/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rossmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerisk.net/?p=50#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I hate the word &quot;contend&quot; in all its manifestations and try not to use it at all.  Whether used correctly or not, the word acts as plow hitched to a good English sentence -- it just slows things down.  I would write something like &quot;You claim that the contract,&quot; or better yet, &quot;You say that the contract.&quot; In any event, I enjoy your posts.  Keep on bloggin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the word &#8220;contend&#8221; in all its manifestations and try not to use it at all.  Whether used correctly or not, the word acts as plow hitched to a good English sentence &#8212; it just slows things down.  I would write something like &#8220;You claim that the contract,&#8221; or better yet, &#8220;You say that the contract.&#8221; In any event, I enjoy your posts.  Keep on bloggin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert White</title>
		<link>http://www.rerisk.net/2006/04/13/contentious-words/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerisk.net/?p=50#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Bloody lawyers! I&#039;d have gone with:

“the contract cannot operate in the way you contend”

or even,  heaven forfend:

“the contract cannot operate the way you contend”

But then, why use fewer words when you bill by the hour?

;-)

Rupert White, Law Society&#039;s Gazette</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody lawyers! I&#8217;d have gone with:</p>
<p>“the contract cannot operate in the way you contend”</p>
<p>or even,  heaven forfend:</p>
<p>“the contract cannot operate the way you contend”</p>
<p>But then, why use fewer words when you bill by the hour?</p>
<p>;-)</p>
<p>Rupert White, Law Society&#8217;s Gazette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

